Ever wish that your logic was inaccurate? As if you were missing pieces to the puzzle? Ever hope that you were missing crucial information that would alter your conclusions, because the conclusions that the evidence points to right now is something you don't want to believe? Or you can't believe?

What if your conclusion draws a contradiction with a conclusion from another grouping of evidences on the same subject? What then? Either one of your conclusions is inaccurate, or you're missing a whole other group of evidences that somehow tie the contradictions together.

So what do you do? What if you're no longer allowed to discover new evidences on the topic? What are you left with? Do you walk away and ignore the unsettling conclusion, or do you continue to struggle and make sense of the evidences that you currently have?

What if you can't make sense of it no matter how you try? You are either left with a contradiction, or loose ends that don't fit together. Neither of those options are livable. Something needs to get solved. Even a glimmer of some sort of solution that ties everything together without contradiction, that would be livable. But this? This is not livable. There is no glimmer of a proper conclusion.

So it's healthier to ignore the problem, right? But what if you can't? What if you're one of those people that need to see the logic (or at least a hint of logic) in every situation? But here you find none. The more you try to find that glimmer of a solution, the deeper you go into the tunnel and the further from sanity you appear.
-------------------------------------------------

Welcome to the mind of a person who runs off of logic, and where contradictions create headaches (if you're lucky) and insanity (if you're not lucky). :D

0 comments